Connect

  • Jim Holincheck's Facebook profile

Inquiry

  • If you are a Gartner client, please click Ask an Analyst to submit an inquiry.
Blog powered by TypePad

« Public Sector HCM Challenges | Main | What are Clients Asking About -- Week Ending August 11, 2006 »

How much transparency is appropriate?

The reality is that industry analyst firms are also customers. We need technology to run our business. It does not make sense for us to build it all ourselves. So, like our clients, we use packaged applications. How transparent should we be about what vendors and products we use?

It is a double-edge sword. If we say what we use, other vendors, and perhaps some of our end-user clients, will consider it an endorsement (even though it has no impact on the research). At least, it is out in the open and the various parties can draw their own conclusions. If we do not say what we use publicly, but it comes out inadvertently, then it could be viewed as trying to hide a bias (even though again, it would not be true). Even, if it does not come out inadvertently, some clients would still prefer to know and draw their own conclusions.

What do you think? Should industry analyst firms have disclosure requirements about the products they use (much like financial analysts disclose their relationships with companies they research)? Sent via Cingular Xpress Mail with Blackberry

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345266e169e200d83464a9af69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference How much transparency is appropriate?:

» Transparency means accountability from The Performance & Talent Management Blog
Though its always true with anything on this blog, i should note here in particular that this post represents my personal opinion on this matter, and not necessarily that of SuccessFactors. Max Why public disclosure of vendor selec... [Read More]

Comments

Jim, I’m not in favor of disclosure. There are many very good applications in any one space and some are better than others solely on how the client operates and their philosophy of process management. Factor in cost and quality of internal IT resources and you have no one perfect solution for all companies of the same type. Staying above it all without having to defend your company’s choice is the only independent way to work.

Thanks, Doug. I appreciate the input. I have been getting a mixed response in comments offline and online. I will be posting again on some of the feedback soon.

Jim, analysts should push for more transparency especially around the research socialization process, love the client inquiry stats you share etc/ But on what solutions you buy, not sure it makes a difference. yours or most vendor's internal IT is not typically world class ...also it is one data point - yours - and will be used by winning vendor to extrapolate in undefensible ways...

Thanks, Vinnie. You make very good points. Customers should not use an analyst firm's choices of technology as an indicator for what would be good for their own organization.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Subscribe

Share

  • AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    My Bookmarks